-
Nuclear Tests Cases ICJ International Court of Justice case summary International Law
#internationallaw #law #animation
Nuclear Tests Cases ICJ International Law explained Lex Animata Hesham Elrafei
Nuclear Tests Cases (Australia v. France ; New Zealand v. France) 1973 I.C.J. Rep. 99; 1974 I.C.J. Rep. 253, 457 .
In 1972, France conducted atmospheric nuclear tests in the South Pacific.
Australia and New Zealand, in separate but identical proceedings before the International Court of justice, claimed that the tests were inconsistent with international law, and had caused radioactive fallout damage in their countries.
They instituted proceedings against France, founding the jurisdiction of the Court on the 1928 General Act for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, and articles 36 and 37 of the Statute of the Court.
In 1973 , France sent a letter to the ...
published: 01 Mar 2022
-
OLA Webinar -- Nuclear Law in Practice — The IAEA Perspective
IAEA Office of Legal Affairs (OLA) Webinar on Nuclear Law in Practice - The IAEA Perspective, 15 December 2020.
Subscribe for more videos: http://goo.gl/VxsqCz
Follow IAEA on social media:
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/iaeaorg/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/iaeaorg
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/iaeaorg/
LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/iaea
© IAEA Office of Public Information and Communication
http://iaea.org
published: 11 Jan 2021
-
Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion (Lawfulness of nuclear weapons)
In this international law case, the General Assembly asked the ICJ to rule on whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons was lawful. The ICJ refused to rule such weapons unlawful, but said they must be used in accordance with the other rules of war, which means they must be used in a way that distinguishes civilians from combatants, and which minimises unnecessary suffering - both of which are essentially impossible for nuclear weapons.
published: 24 Sep 2021
-
Nuclear Weapons and the Abandonment of International Law
The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation hosts this annual symposium on important cutting-edge issues of international law. In this installment, a panel of experts discusses the theme of nuclear weapons and the abandonment of international law before a community and campus audience at the Victoria Hall Theatre in Santa Barbara.
Series: "Nuclear Age Peace Foundation" [6/2006] [Public Affairs] [Show ID: 11677]
published: 26 Feb 2008
-
Nuclear Law Institute
Every year, the IAEA organizes a two-week intensive training course on nuclear law. This event, known as the Nuclear Law Institute, is open to up to 60 participants, primarily lawyers, from IAEA Member States.
Story: Alejandra Silva, video: Svetlomir Slavchev
Subscribe for more videos: http://goo.gl/VxsqCz
Follow IAEA on social media:
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/iaeaorg/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/iaeaorg
Google+ - https://plus.google.com/+iaea
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/iaeaorg/
LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/iaea
© IAEA Office of Public Information and Communication
http://iaea.org
published: 09 Oct 2018
-
North Korea passes new nuclear law, nukes needed to counter hostilities from hostile forces | WION
North Korea has passed a law - the right to use preventive nuclear strikes to prevent itself. Additionally, the law declares North Korea status as a nuclear arm state, irreversible. Reportedly, the law allows North Korea to carry out a preventive nuclear strike immediately to destroy hostile forces.
#NorthKorea #Nuclearlaw #worldnews
About Channel:
WION The World is One News, examines global issues with in-depth analysis. We provide much more than the news of the day. Our aim to empower people to explore their world. With our Global headquarters in New Delhi, we bring you news on the hour, by the hour. We deliver information that is not biased. We are journalists who are neutral to the core and non-partisan when it comes to the politics of the world. People are tired of biased report...
published: 09 Sep 2022
-
Presidential First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Is it Legal? Is it Constitutional? Is it Just?
11/4/17 | Harvard University, Science Center Hall C
Nuclear weapons strategy in the United States is designed around “presidential first use,” an arrangement that enables one man, the president, to kill and maim many millions of people in a single afternoon. What legal or philosophical principle differentiates the moral harm or moral wrong that would be attributed to a terrorist, non-state actor or hacker who delivered a nuclear weapon from a presidential launch of a nuclear weapon?
The conference brought together international and constitutional scholars and statesmen to examine the nature of presidential first use in the United States, as well as parallel arrangements in the other eight nuclear states. Senator Markey and Congressman McGovern described H.R.669/S.200 “Restricting First U...
published: 07 Feb 2018
-
Why all states must join the nuclear treaty ban now | The Laws of War | ICRC
There are almost 14,000 nuclear bombs worldwide. Thousands ready to launch anytime, more powerful than those which devastated Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.
Nuclear agreements are being abandoned, new weapons are being produced, and serious threats are being made.
That's why we need a #NuclearBan. Visit https://www.icrc.org/en/nuclear-ban-treaty-no-to-nukes to learn more.
published: 31 Jul 2020
-
US Charges Yakuza Leader for Nuclear Material Trafficking
United States authorities have charged Takeshi Ebisawa, a leader of a Japanese criminal group, with conspiring to sell nuclear material acquired from Myanmar. The indictment alleges Ebisawa planned to fund an arms deal with proceeds from the sale. Assistant Attorney Generall Matthew Olsen emphasized the threat to national security posed by such activities. Ebisawa faces up to 25 years for seeking surface-to-air missiles and 20 years for trafficking nuclear materials internationally. The case highlights the global reach and dangerous ambitions of organized crime networks. No trial date has been set.
published: 26 Feb 2024
-
North Korea's new law allows for preventive nuclear strike | Analysis
North Korea passed a law allowing it to carry out a preventive nuclear strike and declaring its status as a nuclear-armed state "irreversible", state media KCNA said on Friday (Sep 9). The new law bars any negotiation on denuclearisation. Dr Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor for Department of Politics and International Studies at International Christian University gives us his analysis on CNA's Asia First.
Read more: https://cna.asia/3cUQ8Hz
Subscribe to our channel here: https://cna.asia/youtubesub
Subscribe to our news service on Telegram: https://cna.asia/telegram
Follow us:
CNA: https://cna.asia
CNA Lifestyle: http://www.cnalifestyle.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/channelnewsasia
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/channelnewsasia
Twitter: https://www.twi...
published: 09 Sep 2022
1:40
Nuclear Tests Cases ICJ International Court of Justice case summary International Law
#internationallaw #law #animation
Nuclear Tests Cases ICJ International Law explained Lex Animata Hesham Elrafei
Nuclear Tests Cases (Australia v. France ; N...
#internationallaw #law #animation
Nuclear Tests Cases ICJ International Law explained Lex Animata Hesham Elrafei
Nuclear Tests Cases (Australia v. France ; New Zealand v. France) 1973 I.C.J. Rep. 99; 1974 I.C.J. Rep. 253, 457 .
In 1972, France conducted atmospheric nuclear tests in the South Pacific.
Australia and New Zealand, in separate but identical proceedings before the International Court of justice, claimed that the tests were inconsistent with international law, and had caused radioactive fallout damage in their countries.
They instituted proceedings against France, founding the jurisdiction of the Court on the 1928 General Act for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, and articles 36 and 37 of the Statute of the Court.
In 1973 , France sent a letter to the Court stating that it considered the Court not competent and did not accept its jurisdiction.
On the request of Australia and New Zealand for interim measures of protection, the Court indicated that the non-appearance of France could not by itself prevent the Court from indicating interim measures.
And that, as there was a prima facie ground for the Court's jurisdiction and the possibility of uncorrectable damage to Australia and New Zealand by radioactive fallout could not be excluded, France should, pending a final decision, avoid nuclear tests causing the deposit of radioactive fallout on Australian territory.
In 1974, the Court held that Australia and New Zealand's Claims no longer had any object and that the Court was therefore not called upon to give a decision, as France declared its intention to hold no further nuclear tests in the South Pacific, and consequently the dispute had accordingly disappeared.
https://wn.com/Nuclear_Tests_Cases_Icj_International_Court_Of_Justice_Case_Summary_International_Law
#internationallaw #law #animation
Nuclear Tests Cases ICJ International Law explained Lex Animata Hesham Elrafei
Nuclear Tests Cases (Australia v. France ; New Zealand v. France) 1973 I.C.J. Rep. 99; 1974 I.C.J. Rep. 253, 457 .
In 1972, France conducted atmospheric nuclear tests in the South Pacific.
Australia and New Zealand, in separate but identical proceedings before the International Court of justice, claimed that the tests were inconsistent with international law, and had caused radioactive fallout damage in their countries.
They instituted proceedings against France, founding the jurisdiction of the Court on the 1928 General Act for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, and articles 36 and 37 of the Statute of the Court.
In 1973 , France sent a letter to the Court stating that it considered the Court not competent and did not accept its jurisdiction.
On the request of Australia and New Zealand for interim measures of protection, the Court indicated that the non-appearance of France could not by itself prevent the Court from indicating interim measures.
And that, as there was a prima facie ground for the Court's jurisdiction and the possibility of uncorrectable damage to Australia and New Zealand by radioactive fallout could not be excluded, France should, pending a final decision, avoid nuclear tests causing the deposit of radioactive fallout on Australian territory.
In 1974, the Court held that Australia and New Zealand's Claims no longer had any object and that the Court was therefore not called upon to give a decision, as France declared its intention to hold no further nuclear tests in the South Pacific, and consequently the dispute had accordingly disappeared.
- published: 01 Mar 2022
- views: 5785
1:15:34
OLA Webinar -- Nuclear Law in Practice — The IAEA Perspective
IAEA Office of Legal Affairs (OLA) Webinar on Nuclear Law in Practice - The IAEA Perspective, 15 December 2020.
Subscribe for more videos: http://goo.gl/VxsqCz...
IAEA Office of Legal Affairs (OLA) Webinar on Nuclear Law in Practice - The IAEA Perspective, 15 December 2020.
Subscribe for more videos: http://goo.gl/VxsqCz
Follow IAEA on social media:
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/iaeaorg/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/iaeaorg
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/iaeaorg/
LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/iaea
© IAEA Office of Public Information and Communication
http://iaea.org
https://wn.com/Ola_Webinar_Nuclear_Law_In_Practice_—_The_Iaea_Perspective
IAEA Office of Legal Affairs (OLA) Webinar on Nuclear Law in Practice - The IAEA Perspective, 15 December 2020.
Subscribe for more videos: http://goo.gl/VxsqCz
Follow IAEA on social media:
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/iaeaorg/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/iaeaorg
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/iaeaorg/
LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/iaea
© IAEA Office of Public Information and Communication
http://iaea.org
- published: 11 Jan 2021
- views: 5022
3:26
Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion (Lawfulness of nuclear weapons)
In this international law case, the General Assembly asked the ICJ to rule on whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons was lawful. The ICJ refused to rule ...
In this international law case, the General Assembly asked the ICJ to rule on whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons was lawful. The ICJ refused to rule such weapons unlawful, but said they must be used in accordance with the other rules of war, which means they must be used in a way that distinguishes civilians from combatants, and which minimises unnecessary suffering - both of which are essentially impossible for nuclear weapons.
https://wn.com/Nuclear_Weapons_Advisory_Opinion_(Lawfulness_Of_Nuclear_Weapons)
In this international law case, the General Assembly asked the ICJ to rule on whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons was lawful. The ICJ refused to rule such weapons unlawful, but said they must be used in accordance with the other rules of war, which means they must be used in a way that distinguishes civilians from combatants, and which minimises unnecessary suffering - both of which are essentially impossible for nuclear weapons.
- published: 24 Sep 2021
- views: 2825
1:29:31
Nuclear Weapons and the Abandonment of International Law
The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation hosts this annual symposium on important cutting-edge issues of international law. In this installment, a panel of experts disc...
The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation hosts this annual symposium on important cutting-edge issues of international law. In this installment, a panel of experts discusses the theme of nuclear weapons and the abandonment of international law before a community and campus audience at the Victoria Hall Theatre in Santa Barbara.
Series: "Nuclear Age Peace Foundation" [6/2006] [Public Affairs] [Show ID: 11677]
https://wn.com/Nuclear_Weapons_And_The_Abandonment_Of_International_Law
The Nuclear Age Peace Foundation hosts this annual symposium on important cutting-edge issues of international law. In this installment, a panel of experts discusses the theme of nuclear weapons and the abandonment of international law before a community and campus audience at the Victoria Hall Theatre in Santa Barbara.
Series: "Nuclear Age Peace Foundation" [6/2006] [Public Affairs] [Show ID: 11677]
- published: 26 Feb 2008
- views: 1358
1:28
Nuclear Law Institute
Every year, the IAEA organizes a two-week intensive training course on nuclear law. This event, known as the Nuclear Law Institute, is open to up to 60 particip...
Every year, the IAEA organizes a two-week intensive training course on nuclear law. This event, known as the Nuclear Law Institute, is open to up to 60 participants, primarily lawyers, from IAEA Member States.
Story: Alejandra Silva, video: Svetlomir Slavchev
Subscribe for more videos: http://goo.gl/VxsqCz
Follow IAEA on social media:
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/iaeaorg/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/iaeaorg
Google+ - https://plus.google.com/+iaea
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/iaeaorg/
LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/iaea
© IAEA Office of Public Information and Communication
http://iaea.org
https://wn.com/Nuclear_Law_Institute
Every year, the IAEA organizes a two-week intensive training course on nuclear law. This event, known as the Nuclear Law Institute, is open to up to 60 participants, primarily lawyers, from IAEA Member States.
Story: Alejandra Silva, video: Svetlomir Slavchev
Subscribe for more videos: http://goo.gl/VxsqCz
Follow IAEA on social media:
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/iaeaorg/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/iaeaorg
Google+ - https://plus.google.com/+iaea
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/iaeaorg/
LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/iaea
© IAEA Office of Public Information and Communication
http://iaea.org
- published: 09 Oct 2018
- views: 1389
1:59
North Korea passes new nuclear law, nukes needed to counter hostilities from hostile forces | WION
North Korea has passed a law - the right to use preventive nuclear strikes to prevent itself. Additionally, the law declares North Korea status as a nuclear arm...
North Korea has passed a law - the right to use preventive nuclear strikes to prevent itself. Additionally, the law declares North Korea status as a nuclear arm state, irreversible. Reportedly, the law allows North Korea to carry out a preventive nuclear strike immediately to destroy hostile forces.
#NorthKorea #Nuclearlaw #worldnews
About Channel:
WION The World is One News, examines global issues with in-depth analysis. We provide much more than the news of the day. Our aim to empower people to explore their world. With our Global headquarters in New Delhi, we bring you news on the hour, by the hour. We deliver information that is not biased. We are journalists who are neutral to the core and non-partisan when it comes to the politics of the world. People are tired of biased reportage and we stand for a globalised united world. So for us the World is truly One.
Please keep discussions on this channel clean and respectful and refrain from using racist or sexist slurs as well as personal insults.
Subscribe to our channel at https://goo.gl/JfY3NI
Check out our website: http://www.wionews.com
Connect with us on our social media handles:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WIONews
Twitter: https://twitter.com/WIONews
Follow us on Google News for latest updates
Zee News:- https://bit.ly/2Ac5G60
Zee Bussiness:- https://bit.ly/36vI2xa
DNA India:- https://bit.ly/2ZDuLRY
WION: https://bit.ly/3gnDb5J
Zee News Apps : https://bit.ly/ZeeNewsApps
https://wn.com/North_Korea_Passes_New_Nuclear_Law,_Nukes_Needed_To_Counter_Hostilities_From_Hostile_Forces_|_Wion
North Korea has passed a law - the right to use preventive nuclear strikes to prevent itself. Additionally, the law declares North Korea status as a nuclear arm state, irreversible. Reportedly, the law allows North Korea to carry out a preventive nuclear strike immediately to destroy hostile forces.
#NorthKorea #Nuclearlaw #worldnews
About Channel:
WION The World is One News, examines global issues with in-depth analysis. We provide much more than the news of the day. Our aim to empower people to explore their world. With our Global headquarters in New Delhi, we bring you news on the hour, by the hour. We deliver information that is not biased. We are journalists who are neutral to the core and non-partisan when it comes to the politics of the world. People are tired of biased reportage and we stand for a globalised united world. So for us the World is truly One.
Please keep discussions on this channel clean and respectful and refrain from using racist or sexist slurs as well as personal insults.
Subscribe to our channel at https://goo.gl/JfY3NI
Check out our website: http://www.wionews.com
Connect with us on our social media handles:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WIONews
Twitter: https://twitter.com/WIONews
Follow us on Google News for latest updates
Zee News:- https://bit.ly/2Ac5G60
Zee Bussiness:- https://bit.ly/36vI2xa
DNA India:- https://bit.ly/2ZDuLRY
WION: https://bit.ly/3gnDb5J
Zee News Apps : https://bit.ly/ZeeNewsApps
- published: 09 Sep 2022
- views: 91038
6:38
Presidential First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Is it Legal? Is it Constitutional? Is it Just?
11/4/17 | Harvard University, Science Center Hall C
Nuclear weapons strategy in the United States is designed around “presidential first use,” an arrangement t...
11/4/17 | Harvard University, Science Center Hall C
Nuclear weapons strategy in the United States is designed around “presidential first use,” an arrangement that enables one man, the president, to kill and maim many millions of people in a single afternoon. What legal or philosophical principle differentiates the moral harm or moral wrong that would be attributed to a terrorist, non-state actor or hacker who delivered a nuclear weapon from a presidential launch of a nuclear weapon?
The conference brought together international and constitutional scholars and statesmen to examine the nature of presidential first use in the United States, as well as parallel arrangements in the other eight nuclear states. Senator Markey and Congressman McGovern described H.R.669/S.200 “Restricting First Use of Nuclear Weapons Act of 2017.”
Co-chairs: Elaine Scarry. Jonathan King.
Speakers: Bruce Ackerman. Kennette Benedict. Bruce Blair. Sissela Bok. Rosa Brooks. John Burroughs. Hugh Gusterson. Ed Markey. Jim McGovern. Zia Mian. William Perry.
Cosponsors: Harvard’s Mahindra Humanities Center. Harvard’s Office of the Dean of Arts and Humanities. Mass Peace Action. Institute for People’s Engagement. Union of Concerned Scientists.
http://mahindrahumanities.fas.harvard.edu/content/presidential-first-use-nuclear-weapons-it-legal-it-constitutional-it-just
https://wn.com/Presidential_First_Use_Of_Nuclear_Weapons_Is_It_Legal_Is_It_Constitutional_Is_It_Just
11/4/17 | Harvard University, Science Center Hall C
Nuclear weapons strategy in the United States is designed around “presidential first use,” an arrangement that enables one man, the president, to kill and maim many millions of people in a single afternoon. What legal or philosophical principle differentiates the moral harm or moral wrong that would be attributed to a terrorist, non-state actor or hacker who delivered a nuclear weapon from a presidential launch of a nuclear weapon?
The conference brought together international and constitutional scholars and statesmen to examine the nature of presidential first use in the United States, as well as parallel arrangements in the other eight nuclear states. Senator Markey and Congressman McGovern described H.R.669/S.200 “Restricting First Use of Nuclear Weapons Act of 2017.”
Co-chairs: Elaine Scarry. Jonathan King.
Speakers: Bruce Ackerman. Kennette Benedict. Bruce Blair. Sissela Bok. Rosa Brooks. John Burroughs. Hugh Gusterson. Ed Markey. Jim McGovern. Zia Mian. William Perry.
Cosponsors: Harvard’s Mahindra Humanities Center. Harvard’s Office of the Dean of Arts and Humanities. Mass Peace Action. Institute for People’s Engagement. Union of Concerned Scientists.
http://mahindrahumanities.fas.harvard.edu/content/presidential-first-use-nuclear-weapons-it-legal-it-constitutional-it-just
- published: 07 Feb 2018
- views: 6609
1:31
Why all states must join the nuclear treaty ban now | The Laws of War | ICRC
There are almost 14,000 nuclear bombs worldwide. Thousands ready to launch anytime, more powerful than those which devastated Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.
...
There are almost 14,000 nuclear bombs worldwide. Thousands ready to launch anytime, more powerful than those which devastated Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.
Nuclear agreements are being abandoned, new weapons are being produced, and serious threats are being made.
That's why we need a #NuclearBan. Visit https://www.icrc.org/en/nuclear-ban-treaty-no-to-nukes to learn more.
https://wn.com/Why_All_States_Must_Join_The_Nuclear_Treaty_Ban_Now_|_The_Laws_Of_War_|_Icrc
There are almost 14,000 nuclear bombs worldwide. Thousands ready to launch anytime, more powerful than those which devastated Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.
Nuclear agreements are being abandoned, new weapons are being produced, and serious threats are being made.
That's why we need a #NuclearBan. Visit https://www.icrc.org/en/nuclear-ban-treaty-no-to-nukes to learn more.
- published: 31 Jul 2020
- views: 952178
0:41
US Charges Yakuza Leader for Nuclear Material Trafficking
United States authorities have charged Takeshi Ebisawa, a leader of a Japanese criminal group, with conspiring to sell nuclear material acquired from Myanmar. T...
United States authorities have charged Takeshi Ebisawa, a leader of a Japanese criminal group, with conspiring to sell nuclear material acquired from Myanmar. The indictment alleges Ebisawa planned to fund an arms deal with proceeds from the sale. Assistant Attorney Generall Matthew Olsen emphasized the threat to national security posed by such activities. Ebisawa faces up to 25 years for seeking surface-to-air missiles and 20 years for trafficking nuclear materials internationally. The case highlights the global reach and dangerous ambitions of organized crime networks. No trial date has been set.
https://wn.com/US_Charges_Yakuza_Leader_For_Nuclear_Material_Trafficking
United States authorities have charged Takeshi Ebisawa, a leader of a Japanese criminal group, with conspiring to sell nuclear material acquired from Myanmar. The indictment alleges Ebisawa planned to fund an arms deal with proceeds from the sale. Assistant Attorney Generall Matthew Olsen emphasized the threat to national security posed by such activities. Ebisawa faces up to 25 years for seeking surface-to-air missiles and 20 years for trafficking nuclear materials internationally. The case highlights the global reach and dangerous ambitions of organized crime networks. No trial date has been set.
- published: 26 Feb 2024
- views: 511
7:35
North Korea's new law allows for preventive nuclear strike | Analysis
North Korea passed a law allowing it to carry out a preventive nuclear strike and declaring its status as a nuclear-armed state "irreversible", state media KCNA...
North Korea passed a law allowing it to carry out a preventive nuclear strike and declaring its status as a nuclear-armed state "irreversible", state media KCNA said on Friday (Sep 9). The new law bars any negotiation on denuclearisation. Dr Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor for Department of Politics and International Studies at International Christian University gives us his analysis on CNA's Asia First.
Read more: https://cna.asia/3cUQ8Hz
Subscribe to our channel here: https://cna.asia/youtubesub
Subscribe to our news service on Telegram: https://cna.asia/telegram
Follow us:
CNA: https://cna.asia
CNA Lifestyle: http://www.cnalifestyle.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/channelnewsasia
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/channelnewsasia
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/channelnewsasia
https://wn.com/North_Korea's_New_Law_Allows_For_Preventive_Nuclear_Strike_|_Analysis
North Korea passed a law allowing it to carry out a preventive nuclear strike and declaring its status as a nuclear-armed state "irreversible", state media KCNA said on Friday (Sep 9). The new law bars any negotiation on denuclearisation. Dr Stephen Nagy, Senior Associate Professor for Department of Politics and International Studies at International Christian University gives us his analysis on CNA's Asia First.
Read more: https://cna.asia/3cUQ8Hz
Subscribe to our channel here: https://cna.asia/youtubesub
Subscribe to our news service on Telegram: https://cna.asia/telegram
Follow us:
CNA: https://cna.asia
CNA Lifestyle: http://www.cnalifestyle.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/channelnewsasia
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/channelnewsasia
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/channelnewsasia
- published: 09 Sep 2022
- views: 29864